Legal Opinion

Families Against Corporate Takeover v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 2000No. 82,962PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

This case raises the jurisdictional issue of standing. Petitioner, Families Against Corporate Takeover (FACT), appeals from a district court dismissal of a petition for judicial review of administrative agency action. FACT sought review of a Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) permit authorizing construction of a 14,300-head hog farm in Hodgeman County. The district court sustained a K.S.A. 60-212(b)(6) motion filed by KDHE and dismissed the case, finding that FACT had no standing to sue. FACT appeals.

Our jurisdiction is under…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Bruggeman Ex Rel. Bruggeman v. SchimkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Moorhouse v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. Sierra Club v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  4. BOARD OF COM'RS OF SUMNER COUNTY v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API