Families Against Corporate Takeover v. Mitchell
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Six, J.:
This case raises the jurisdictional issue of standing. Petitioner, Families Against Corporate Takeover (FACT), appeals from a district court dismissal of a petition for judicial review of administrative agency action. FACT sought review of a Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE) permit authorizing construction of a 14,300-head hog farm in Hodgeman County. The district court sustained a K.S.A. 60-212(b)(6) motion filed by KDHE and dismissed the case, finding that FACT had no standing to sue. FACT appeals.
Our jurisdiction is under…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In Re the Marriage of KillmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Bruggeman Ex Rel. Bruggeman v. SchimkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Moorhouse v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Board of County Commissioners v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Sierra Club v. MoserSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- BOARD OF COM'RS OF SUMNER COUNTY v. BrembySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- Creecy v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.