Legal Opinion
Wilcox v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 15, 1909No. 6394PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Error to Rio Grande County Court — Hon. Alden Bassett, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbeet
The question presented is the validity of the Itinerant Vendors’ Act, Session Laws 1905, p. 274, upon the facts under which plaintiff in error was convicted and fined for violating its provisions. The act in question, so far as involved, provides that an itinerant vendor is one “who engages in either a temporary or transient business in this state, either in one locality or in traveling about the country, or from- place to place, selling manufactured goods, wares or merchandise. ’ ’
The facts upon which plaintiff in error was found guilty are substantially as follows: He represented in Bio…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Leloup v. Port of MobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Brennan v. TitusvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Asher v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moffitt v. City of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
- State v. MarcusNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- State v. EckenrodeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- People v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993