Legal Opinion
State v. Marcus
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1929No. 3363PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WATSON, J.
Upon an agreed statement of facts, appellant was convicted of having operated in Santa Fe county as an “itinerant vendor” without payment of license. He was an employee of a permanent business house in Bernalilta county, and in that capacity had leased a hotel room and was exhibiting to the public samples of ladies’ apparel, and taking orders for delivery from the house in Albuquerque. It seems to be agreed that the prosecution was under Code 1915, c. 61, art. 1.
Appellant’s first contention is that, as the business which he represented was permanently established…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Naylor v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Smith v. FarrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Leonard v. ReedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
- Harrington v. Harrington's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1881
- Swift & Co. v. SonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- Quintana v. New Mexico Department of CorrectionsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Department of Revenue & Taxation, Motor Vehicle Division v. ShipleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- DEPT. OF REV. & TAX., MVD v. ShipleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ClarkNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.