Legal Opinion
Brann v. Mahoney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided July 23, 1946No. [No. 170, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This is an appeal by W. L. Brann and Sylvester W. Labrot, Jr., owners and breeders of race horses, and Edward A. Christmas and Clay Sutphin, licensed trainers of horses, hereinafter known as appellants, from an order of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City sustaining a demurrer to the supplemental bill of complaint, filed by them, without leave to amend and dismissing the supplemental bill.
The appellants filed an original bill of.complaint in which Messrs. Brann and Labrot alleged the fact that they were owners and breeders of race horses and had a considerable investment in the business. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Mayor of Baltimore v. RadeckeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1878
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Greenfeld v. Maryland Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Stoewer v. Porcelain Enamel & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Big Vein Coal Co. v. LeasureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
- Lussier v. Maryland Racing CommissionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.