Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Heidelberg L.L.C.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 16, 2008No. 06-4790-cvPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Dona J. Jackson appeals from a judgment of the District Court, entered October 11, 2006, enforcing the terms of a settlement agreement made in open court on February 6, 2006. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history of this case.

On appeal, plaintiff argues principally that the settlement agreement with defendant Heidelberg L.L.C. — her former employer — is unenforceable for two reasons:(1) plaintiff agreed to the settlement under duress, after the District Court, defendant, and a state prosecutor conspired to deprive her of her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Powell v. OmnicomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Kamerman v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. Eloy A. Role v. Eureka Lodge No. 434, I.A. Of M & A.W. Afl-Cio and Die-Matic Products, Inc., Docket No. 04-2848-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. United States Currency in Sum of Six Hundred Sixty Thousand, Two Hundred Dollars ($660,200.00)District Court, E.D. New York · 2006

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Massie v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Sprint Communications Co. v. Jasco Trading, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Bastedo v. North Rose-Wolcott Central School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013
  4. Lombardo v. Trans Union, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API