Legal Opinion
Eloy A. Role v. Eureka Lodge No. 434, I.A. Of M & A.W. Afl-Cio and Die-Matic Products, Inc., Docket No. 04-2848-Cv
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 23, 2005No. 314PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
In August 2000 plaintiff-appellant Eloy A. Role filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York a complaint raising numerous federal and state causes of action against Die-Matic Products, Inc. (“Die-Matic”), and Eureka Lodge No. 434, I.A. of M & A.W., AFL-CIO (“Eureka Lodge”), arising from the termination of his employment at Die-Matic. On December 4, 2002, the parties appeared before Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Boyle to effect a settlement of all claims against Die-Matic and Eureka Lodge, excluding plaintiffs then-pending workers’ compensation claim.
At the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gene M. Oswalt Et Vir v. Scripto, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Tokai-Seiki Kk, a Japanese Corporation, Defendant-Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Pipeliners Local Union No. 798, Tulsa, Oklahoma, and A. Leroy Jones v. Fred H. EllerdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Louis Orsini and Mary Orsini v. Nahum Kugel and German C. Garcia, Jean Paul Pierre and Moisture Hacking Corp., Chris Roos and George RoosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Melvin Memphrey Carter v. Beverly Hills Savings and Loan Association Southland CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Camacho v. MancusoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by20 opinions
- Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Omega, S.A., Docket No. 04-5084-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Powell v. OmnicomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Rambus Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
- Sprint Communications Co. v. Jasco Trading, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Langreich v. GruenbaumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.