Legal Opinion

People v. Szymanski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 10, 1992No. 2-90-0054PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Brian Szymanski, was convicted of the offense of forgery (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 17—3(a)(1)). He was sentenced to probation for a term of two years and was ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $500. The defendant raises two issues on appeal: (1) whether he is entitled to a new trial or, in the alternative, an evidentiary hearing, because of evidence of jury misconduct; and (2) whether improper argument by the prosecutor deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm.

The defendant was charged by indictment with the offenses of forgery (Ill.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. People v. NitzIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. HolmesIllinois Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. HobleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Modelski v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  3. Modelski v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  4. Modelski v. Navistar Intn'l Transportation Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
  5. People v. HobleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API