Legal Opinion
Stephens v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided January 13, 1998No. CIV.A. G-96-286PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KENT, District Judge.
In this action, Plaintiff Willie Stephens brings claims of negligence against Defendants Southern Pacific Transportation Company (“Southern Pacific”), St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company, and General Electric Company (“GE”). Now before the Court is Defendant GE’s Motion for Summary Judgment, filed November 5, 1997. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is DENIED.
Plaintiff, an employee of Southern Pacific, was allegedly injured due to exposure to hazardous materials while working on a GE locomotive engine in the Pine Bluff, Arkansas shop of Southern Pacific. GE…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harold S. McDaniel v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Third Party v. Force Corporation, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Winston B. Lewy v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Central of Georgia Railway Company, Third-Party v. Riegel Textile Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Ft. Worth & Denver Railway Company v. Claude Threadgill and E. J. Haymes and Nunn Electric Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Engvall v. Soo Line Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003