In Re Brodsky v. Brodsky

This action for divorce comes here again, Brodsky v. Brodsky, 164 Minn. 102, 204 N. W. 915, 172 Minn. 250, 215 N. W. 181, upon an issue between plaintiff and Herbert P. Keller, who was her attorney from the beginning of the case through its first trial. After that other attorneys were substituted for Mr. Keller. Defendant was finally granted a divorce from plaintiff on a cross-complaint, but a sum of money was ordered paid into court by defendant for plaintiff’s benefit. Upon that fund Mr. Keller asserted an attorney’s lien for his unpaid fees and his disbursements for plaintiff’s benefit.…