Legal Opinion
United States v. Leonard
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 22, 1992No. 91-1251PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HURLEY, District Judge.
In the above-referenced prosecution, James Leonard (“Leonard”), Donald Brown (“Brown”), Robert Seyfert (“Seyfert”), and John Papajohn, Jr. (“Papajohn”), are charged in a one-count superseding indictment with conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute hashish, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846 and 841(b)(1)(C). Currently before the Court are various pretrial motions made both individually and collectively by defendants. Within this Memorandum and Order, the Court addresses those aspects of the motions discussed below.
BACKGROUND
The factual background…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Lai-Moi Leung and Seow Ming ChoonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. James Leonard, Robert Seyfert, John Papajohn and Donald M. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. MurgasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Murray v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. HenryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.