Legal Opinion

RUN CORP. v. Box Elder County

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 27, 2006No. 1:03-cr-00064PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER -DENYING' PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION' FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

CASSELL, District Judge.

The patties in this zoning dispute have previously settled theiir claims and jointly moved to dismiss the suit. Both plaintiff RHN Corporation and the lone remaining defendant, Box Elder County, now move for their respective attorneys’ fees and costs. Under controlling legal authority, río such costs or fees are appropriate. Accordingly, the court DENIES RHN’s motion for attorneys’ fees (# 51) and DENIES Box Elder County’s motion for attorneys’ fees…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Maxfield v. CoxDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021