Legal Opinion

In Re September 11 Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 19, 2011No. 21 MC 101 (AKH). No. 04 Civ. 7318PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

760 F.Supp.2d 433 (2011)

In re SEPTEMBER 11 LITIGATION.

Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

American Airlines, Inc. and AMR Corp., Defendants.

No. 21 MC 101 (AKH). No. 04 Civ. 7318.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

January 19, 2011.

ORDER AND OPINION GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO LIMIT PLAINTIFFS' DAMAGES

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, District Judge:

Defendants American Airlines, Inc., and AMR Corporation (collectively "American") move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for partial summary judgment to limit the scope of damages that Plaintiffs associated with Cantor…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Palka v. Servicemaster Management Services Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. In Re Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  4. Alvord & Swift v. Stewart M. Muller Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. 532 Madison Avenue Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Center, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Scott v. United Odd Fellow and Rebekah Home d/b/a Rebekah Rehab and Extended Care CenterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  2. State v. A. LaForge IIIMontana Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API