Wood v. Morbark Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the first-impression issue of whether Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence applies to exclude evidence of subsequent remedial measures in strict products liability cases. We find that Rule 407 and the exceptions thereto do apply in strict products liability cases. The district court erred in its admonition to the jury to disregard the testimony concerning subsequent remedial measures that was properly admitted for impeachment purposes, and, consequently, erroneously denied Wood’s motion for a new trial. Accordingly, we reverse the denial of the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Osterneck v. Ernst & WhinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Forrest A. Flaminio and Gloria Flaminio v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Grenada Steel Industries, Inc. v. Alabama Oxygen Company, Inc. And Sherwood-Selpac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Werner v. Upjohn Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tuer v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Misener v. General MotorsDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1996
- Carlos L Perez Rosado v. El VoceroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999
- 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 269, prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 14,457 Ruby Wood, Personal Representative of the Estate of Ginger Wood, Deceased v. Morbark Industries, Inc., and Morbark Miss., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Pérez Rosado v. El Vocero de Puerto Rico, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1999