Legal Opinion
Misener v. General Motors
District Court, D. Utah
Decided May 1, 1996No. 92-C-156 GPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendant General Motors has made a motion in limine to prevent plaintiffs from introducing or referring to evidence of design changes in the 1977 Chevrolet Blazer or its components. The plaintiff Lynn A. Misener was seriously injured in a rollover accident while a passenger in defendant General Motors’ 1977 Blazer. The accident occurred on July 5, 1991 after the date of the manufacture of the vehicle. The plaintiff, was traveling in the Blazer with Daniel Manson who had borrowed the vehicle from his father. The vehicle left the road on State Route 40.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Wheeler v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Moe v. Avions Marcel Dassault-Breguet AviationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Betty Jo Chase and Charles M. Chase v. General Motors Corporation, and B & M Chevrolet-Cadillac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Clair W. BURKE, Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, A/K/A John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reiland v. Southland Equipment Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
- Fox v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Henrie v. Northrop Grumman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Childress v. North Charleston South Carolina, City ofDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2019