Legal Opinion

Spitaleri v. Metro Regional Transit Authority

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1980No. 9327PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, P. J.

This appeal raises the question of whether employees of a regional transit authority, as provided for in R. C. 306.30 et seq., are entitled to the wages and certain fringe benefits found in R. C. Chapters 121 and 124. The trial court, in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss per Civ. R. 12(B)(6), held such employees are not so entitled. We affirm.

Facts.

In August of 1978, the employees of the Metro Regional Transit Authority (Metro), who were also members of the Transport Workers Union of America, Local No. 1, AFL-CIO (Union), went on strike.

Metro thereafter sought an injunction against the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dayton Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. Dayton Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Civil Service Personnel Ass'n v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steven A. Wolotsky v. Ralph Huhn Jerome T. Kraker and Portage Path Community Mental Health CenterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
  2. Martin v. Central Ohio Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In Re Appeal of FordOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Finocchi v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Falzone v. RutkowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API