Blue Dane Simmental Corp. v. American Simmental Ass'n
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KOPF, District Judge.
After dismissal of the RICO counterclaims, there remains the question of whether I should dismiss the. state law counterclaims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a) or (c). I carefully considered this question after reviewing the supplemental briefs and evidence. Pursuant to section 1367(a), I shall dismiss the state law counterclaims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because (a) they are not independently supported by federal-question or diversity-of-citizenship jurisdiction, and (b) when compared with Plaintiffs’ claims, they do not arise out of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Elizabeth Forsling Harris v. Gloria Steinem, Patricia Carbine and Ms. Magazine Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Berg v. BCS Financial Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Hunt v. Up North Plastics, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Pecore v. Jennie-O Turkey Store, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Super Natural Distributors, Inc. v. MuscleTech Research & DevelopmentDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.