Legal Opinion
Super Natural Distributors, Inc. v. MuscleTech Research & Development
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided May 22, 2001No. 00-C-1361PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STADTMUELLER, Chief Judge.
Currently before the court in this quickly-escalating battle between two formerly-associated businesses is a motion by plaintiff Super Natural Distributors, Inc. [“Super Natural”] to enjoin defendant MuscleTech Research and Development [“MuscleTech”] from pursuing claims against Super Natural in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York. 1 Super Natural contends that allegations raised by Muscle-Tech in a lawsuit filed in that jurisdiction are compulsory counterclaims to the case at bar and should not be permitted to proceed in any…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern Construction Co. v. PickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federman v. Empire Fire And Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Union Co. v. Southwest Gas Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2001
- Peltz v. Gulfcoast Workstation Group (In Re Bridge Information Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 2003
- Inforizons, Inc. v. Ved Software Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Chugh v. KalraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022