Legal Opinion
Johnson v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 17, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2012-0381PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United' States District Judge
Dr. Andrew Johnson and Dr. Oscar Harp worked for many years as psychologists with the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”). After both were terminated for receiving poor performance ratings under DCPS’s new IMPACT staff evaluation system, they sued, claiming they were actually fired because of their age. The District of Columbia now moves for summary judgment. Although DCPS’s rollout of the IMPACT system apparently left much to be desired, neither Johnson nor Harp has produced evidence to support an inference that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Ronald J. Fischbach v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections and Hallem H. Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Conn v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Ranowsky v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Craig v. MnuchinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Johnson v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Anderson v. Bdo USA, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.