Legal Opinion
Metallo-Chemical Corp. v. Banque Transatlantique Societe Anonyme
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided July 12, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCommas-, J.
I granted a reargument of the defendant’s motion so as to permit an inquiry into the effect of the “ freezing order ”, Executive Order No. 8389 (Code of Fed. Beg., Cum. Supp., tit. 3, p. 645) as amended (issued pursuant to Trading with the Enemy Act, § 5, subd. [b]; U. S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 5, subd. [b]), upon section 922 of the Civil Practice Act. The plaintiff takes the position that since the order forbade the bank (i.e., the trust company), to yield to the attachment, at least to the extent of not paying over the “ blocked account ” to the sheriff in the absence of a license,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commission for Polish Relief, Ltd. v. Banca Nationala a RumanieiNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Nemeroff v. National City BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Sturcke v. LinkNew York Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Marilyn Kay Fernandez, Etc., Banco Nacional De Cuba, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees, Gilbert McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- John C. Lankenau, Esq., as Receiver of Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co. v. Coggeshall & Hicks, Applicant-Appellee. This Case Came Up on Appeal Under the Style SEC v. Brown, That Used in the District Court. Upon Request, However, the Case on Appeal Has Been Renamed, as Indicated. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lester D. Brown, D/B/A L. D. Brown Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965