Legal Opinion

Cook v. Mixon

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 22, 1997No. 29491-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 CARAWAY, Judge.

In this case, a disputed sale of a large tract of timberland was held by the trial court to be in violation of Louisiana’s lesion principles. Soon after the initial sale, a second sale of the property was made to a large timber company for over two and one-half times the first purchase price. This dispute therefore requires a determination of the “fair market value” of the property under La. Civ.Code art. 2589.1 Finding that the trial court misapplied the high legal standard for setting aside as lesionary a transaction involving timber as the principal market value component…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullins v. PageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Mayard v. LaporteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Smith v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  4. Johnson v. Department of Public SafetyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Rogers v. Huie-Hodge Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McConnico v. Red Oak Timber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Joiner v. AbercrombieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API