Legal Opinion

BOYKINS v. SEPTA

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 2025No. 2:22-cv-04447Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAMAR BOYKINS, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. SEPTA, NO. 22-4447 Defendant. HODGE, J. September 26, 2025 MEMORANDUM In this action, Plaintiff Jamar Boykins (“Boykins” or “Plaintiff”) asserts the following claims against his employer, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA” or “Defendant”): (1) race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”) and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”) (Counts I-IV); and (2) interference and retaliation in…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API