Legal Opinion

CIC-TOC Pension Plan v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided November 20, 2012No. Nos. 3:12-cv-00527-ST(LEAD), 3:12-cv-00555-ST(Trailing Case)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

JANICE M. STEWART, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On May 20, 2009, Weyerhaeuser Company (“Weyerhaeuser”) closed a trucking facility in Albany, Oregon (“Albany facility”). This case involves a dispute over whether, as a result of that closure, Weyerhaeuser owes over $5.5 million to the CIC-TOC Pension Plan (“Plan” or “Fund”) under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 (“MPPAA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1461.

In 1974, Congress enacted the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), a pension plan termination insurance program through which the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Coltec Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Milwaukee Brewery Workers' Pension Plan v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Trustees of Iron Workers Local 473 Pension Trust v. Allied Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Leal-VegaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund v. Wasco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  2. Finkel v. Zizza & Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API