Fairview Kennels v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Melvin Mayfield, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an award of the Workers’ Compensation Commission holding that appellant had the requisite number of employees to be subject to the Workers’ Compensation Act and that the appellee received an injury arising out of her employment.
It is appellant’s first contention that she did not have three or more regular employees and thus was not subject to the act.
Appellant is the sole owner and operator of Fairview Kennels. She admits that appellee Cathy Bailey was a regular employee. She also admits that Lane Miller was a regular employee. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Irvan v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
- Parker Stave Company v. HinesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Purdy v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Plastics Research & Development Co. v. GoodpasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Moore v. Darling Store FixturesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
- Craighead Memorial Hospital v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
- Roc-Arc Water Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Nu-Way Laundry & Cleaners v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Griego v. Jones Lang LaSalleNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.