Legal Opinion

Baugh v. Bryant Ltd. Partnerships

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1993No. 86-1-357; CA A48114Published

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

This is an action for contribution and to set aside fraudulent conveyances. Plaintiffs paid a note signed by plaintiffs and six other individuals (defendants). Plaintiffs sought contribution from defendant Bryant and also sought to set aside conveyances made by Bryant after plaintiffs paid the note, allegedly in an effort to shield assets that might be subject to plaintiffs’ claim for contribution. The trial court entered judgment for defendants on both claims. We determined that the judgment was not appealable and granted leave for the court to enter a correct form of judgment. We later…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Baugh v. Bryant Limited PartnershipsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  3. Kaufmann v. NolanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API