Abrams v. Love Canal Area Revitalization Agency
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph D. Mintz, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212, or alternatively for preliminary injunction pending resolution of his action for permanent injunction based on defendants’ alleged failure to comply with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA). Specifically, plaintiff alleges that defendants’ failure to file an environmental impact statement (EIS) and the manner by which defendants completed each environmental assessment (EA) were arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and violative of SEQRA.
Many of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kirk-Astor Drive Neighborhood Ass'n v. Town Board of Town of PittsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Niagara Recycling, Inc. v. Town Board of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Soule v. Town of ColonieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Niagara Recycling, Inc. v. Town Board of NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ecumenical Task Force of Niagara Frontier, Inc. v. Love Canal Area Revitalization AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Abrams v. Love Canal Area Revitalization AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Congdon v. Washington CountyNew York Supreme Court · 1986