Legal Opinion

Remes v. Robison (In Re Van Houten)

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided January 10, 1986No. 19-01945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LAURENCE E. HOWARD, Bankruptcy Judge.

REMAINDER INTEREST AND PROPERTY OF THE ESTATE

The trustee, Richard C. Remes, asks the Court to declare the life estate of Bertha Robison invalid. Alternatively, the trustee requests the debtor’s interest as remainder-man be recognized as property of the estate and that he be permitted to sell the property. Defendant Bertha Robison denies the trustee’s allegations and prays this Court to declare that the bankruptcy estate has no interest whatsoever in the subject real estate.

At the trial, the following facts became clear. Bertha Robison wrote to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  2. Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. Defreese v. LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. William Franklin v. United States of America, Norman G. Price v. United States of America, Joseph J. Brooks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  5. Buell v. Orion State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re HeckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2006
  2. Manfredi v. State, 98-3217 (1999)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API