Legal Opinion

Lee v. Yanaway

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 4, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Memorandum.—Action of account. Appeal from an order of the Cumberland County Circuit Court requiring appellant to account; the Hon. Silas Z. Landes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs

This was an action of account brought by the appellee to compel settlement of accounts and dealings alleged to be unadjusted between the appellee and appellant as co-partners. The pleas of the appellant presented as a defense that he was not liable to account. This issue was submitted to a jury as required by Sec. 6, Chap. 2, R. S. The verdict was adverse to the appellant, and his motion for a new trial was overruled, to which he excepted.

Whereupon the following order was entered: “ And the court orders that M. R. Lee, the defendant, do account to plaintiff, S. S. Yanaway, and that he pay the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ex parte ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Lee v. AbramsIllinois Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. People ex rel. Phillips v. SeversonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904
  3. Rotogravure Service, Inc. v. R. W. Borrowdale Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Town of Magnolia v. KaysAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  5. Meyer v. DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API