Legal Opinion

K AND N ENGINEERING, INC. v. Bulat

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 18, 2007No. 06-55393PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IKUTA, Circuit Judge:

In this case we are asked to decide whether an award of statutory damages for trademark counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c) precludes an award of attorney’s fees under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(b). 1

I

For several decades, appellee K&N Engineering, Inc. (“K & N”) has been engaged in the design, manufacture, and distribution of aftermarket automotive air filters, air intake kits, and related prod ucts. K & N’s stylized logo, the basis for two of K & N’s registered trademarks, appears on decals included with many of K & N’s products. K & N has separately distributed decals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joseph R. Bolker v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Intel Corporation v. Terabyte International, Inc., Jean Hsu, Kenneth HsuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Richard S. v. Department of Developmental Services of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Rolex Watch, U.S.A., Inc. v. Michel Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. Flavio David MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Curtis Rookaird v. Bnsf Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Yelp Inc. v. CatronDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API