Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Crouch

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 27, 1995No. 94-203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The Superior Court {Mohl, J.) ruled that a homeowner’s policy issued by the plaintiff, Allstate Insurance Company, affords coverage to defendant Robert Crouch. The trial court ruled that the policy’s business pursuits exclusion was inapplicable. We reverse.

The case was submitted to the trial court on an agreed statement of facts. Defendants Robert Crouch and Raymond Smith, friends for many years, shared an interest in restoring and repairing vehicles. In their spare time, they worked together on their own vehicles and on those of their friends. In 1986 or 1987, Crouch and Smith formed R & R…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Merrimack School District v. National School Bus Service, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  2. Town of Epping v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Haley v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. Lane v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1972
  5. Edwards v. TrahanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pepper v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Philbrick v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Hoepp v. State Farm InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  4. Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  5. Turner v. St. Paul Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API