Legal Opinion

Fidelity Trust Co. v. McCaughn

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1924No. 10588PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This rale has been taken to raise the question of the lawfulness of a tax exaction, and to that question we go directly. Distinctions are sometimes mere figments of the brain, hut they often serve a useful purpose. One is that between a tax levied upon property and a tax measured by that same property. The thought of Congress was to measure the tax in question by the value of the estate of a decedent which passed at Ms death to others. This was found to work an inequality. What is property and what is a part of the estate of a decedent is determined by the law-making…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. ClausonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1944
  2. Whitlock-Rose v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Clauson v. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API