Fidelity Trust Co. v. McCaughn
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
This rale has been taken to raise the question of the lawfulness of a tax exaction, and to that question we go directly. Distinctions are sometimes mere figments of the brain, hut they often serve a useful purpose. One is that between a tax levied upon property and a tax measured by that same property. The thought of Congress was to measure the tax in question by the value of the estate of a decedent which passed at Ms death to others. This was found to work an inequality. What is property and what is a part of the estate of a decedent is determined by the law-making…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Vaughan v. ClausonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1944
- Whitlock-Rose v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
- Clauson v. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945