Legal Opinion

Whitlock-Rose v. McCaughn

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1926No. 12384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The question raised is solely one of the lawfulness of a tax exaction. If payment of the tax was unlawfully exacted, the plaintiff should have judgment; otherwise, judgment should go in favor of defendant. The general principles involved have been so frequently and so fully discussed that little, if anything, of value can be now contributed. Tbe question is a narrow one in itself. It may be formulated as that of whether the power of appointment here in question is a general power within the meaning of the statute which imposes the tax.

Counsel for plaintiff plants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCaughn v. Girard Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  2. Fidelity Trust Co. v. McCaughnDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vaughan v. ClausonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1944
  2. Clauson v. VaughanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1945
  3. Warren v. Fairfax CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API