Morris Eugene Grimes v. The State of Wyoming
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Chief Justice.
[11] Morris Eugene Grimes was convict, ed after a jury trial of felony interference with a peace officer. On appeal, he claims the evidence that the officer was injured by his actions was insufficient to support the conviction. - We conclude the evidence, viewed in accordance with our standard of review, supports the jury's decision. Consequently, we affirm.
ISSUE
[12] Mr. Grimes presents the following issue on appeal.
I. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support, beyond a reasonable doubt, a conviction for interference with a police officer in violation of Wyo. Stat.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Mueller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
- Michael Lee Cooper v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
- Electrical Wholesale Supply Co., Inc. v. Alane Fraser and M.J. Bishop Concrete & Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
- Flores v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.