Legal Opinion

Morris Eugene Grimes v. The State of Wyoming

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2013No. S-12-0229PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Chief Justice.

[11] Morris Eugene Grimes was convict, ed after a jury trial of felony interference with a peace officer. On appeal, he claims the evidence that the officer was injured by his actions was insufficient to support the conviction. - We conclude the evidence, viewed in accordance with our standard of review, supports the jury's decision. Consequently, we affirm.

ISSUE

[12] Mr. Grimes presents the following issue on appeal.

I. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support, beyond a reasonable doubt, a conviction for interference with a police officer in violation of Wyo. Stat.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McClellan v. TottenhoffWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Story v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Allen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mueller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Larkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Michael Lee Cooper v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Daniel E. Borja, Sr. v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co., Inc. v. Alane Fraser and M.J. Bishop Concrete & Construction, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Flores v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API