Legal Opinion

Rueckert v. City of Flint

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 6, 1998No. 96-CV-74252-DTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This Section 1983/defamation/battery/false imprisonment case is presently before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff has responded to Defendants’ Motion, to which response Defendants have replied. The parties also filed supplemental briefs in support of their respective positions on this matter. Additionally, after the Court heard oral argument on the Mo*858tion, the parties submitted for the Court’s consideration the full transcripts of depositions referenced in…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API