Legal Opinion
Muhammad v. Mendez
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 15, 2002No. CIV. 1:CV-02-0119PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAMBO, District Judge.
This case is a habeas corpus petition brought by Hatim Muhammad against Warden Jake Mendez of the United States Penitentiary at Allenwood in White Deer, Pennsylvania and the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”) filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 1 Petitioner raises various procedural due process violations regarding his initial parole hearing on April 26, 2000 and challenges the Commission’s decision to depart from the guideline ranges for setting a reconsideration hearing. The matter is fully briefed and ripe for consideration. Because Petitioner…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michael Ellis, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Zannino v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Willis E. Campbell v. United States Parole Commission and Joseph S. Petrovsky. Appeal of United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Boone v. MenifeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Simmons v. ShearinDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- McKissick v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2003
- Smallwood v. OddoDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019