Howland v. White
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Action of forcible entry and detainer. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon County; the Hon. Edward P. Vail, Circuit Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court, the
Hon. Carroll C. Boggs, Judge.
It is first contended that the notice given by the appellee was not sufficient to terminate the lease and create a forfeiture. The grounds of such supposed deficiency are thus stated by counsel:
1. Because there is no demand of rent due upon the premises before declaring a forfeiture.
2. Because appellee did not turn over to appellants or offer to deliver up to them all rent notes held by her, except the one on which the forfeiture was declared, according to a provision of the lease to that effect.
The paper served upon the appellant advised…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fisher v. DeeringIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Allen v. PowellIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Farnam v. HohmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barnes v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1897
- Goldblatt Bros. v. Hoefeld, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- David Bradley & Co. v. Peabody Coal Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Public Service Co. v. VoudomasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Forbes v. Star Paper Box Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.