Legal Opinion

State of Illinois v. Milauskas

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. 16887. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The corporation counsel and the city attorney of the city of Springfield filed in the county court of Sangamon county, under section 22 of the Prohibition act, a bill for injunction to abate a liquor nuisance. The bill was verified, and alleged that certain premises therein described were being used and had been used as a place where intoxicating liquors were sold, kept and bartered in violation of the statute, by George Milauskas and Anna Milauskas, and that Christian C. Wieland was the owner of said premises. The affidavits of three persons were attached to the bill, showing specific acts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Cant v. CrossleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. DiekmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  3. People ex rel. Stuckart v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People ex rel. Wies v. BowmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  5. People ex rel. Egan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Owens v. GreenIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Chicago Motor Club v. KinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. The People v. RocheIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. Butler Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. The People v. BorgesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API