Legal Opinion

People v. Diekmann

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1918No. 12028PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Tazewell county; the Hon. J. M. Rahn, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

The State’s attorney of Tazewell county filed an information in the county court of said county under section 47 of an act entitled “An act for the conservation of game, wild fowl, birds and fish in the State of Illinois, for the appointment of a commission and staff for the enforcement thereof, and to repeal certain acts relating thereto,” approved June 23, 1913, in force July 1, 1913, against Remmer Diekmann, appellant, charging that Diekmann had in his possession an unlawful device, to-wit, a seine, and that he was unlawfully using said seine for catching fish in a duly established fish…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Grinnell v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. People v. WilcoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Cummings v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. BridgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People v. HuffIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Klein v. Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  2. People v. ReinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Edelen v. HogsettIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. RogersIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API