Legal Opinion
State v. Hoffman
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1979No. 78-1318PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonofrio, J.
The Court of Appeals states that the issue in conflict is “whether R. C. 2917.11(A)(2) is unconstitu*131tionally vague and overbroad on its face,” in violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
JR. C. 2917.11, in part; states:
“(A.) No person shall recklessly cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to another, by doing any of the following :
“(1) Engaging in fighting, in threatening harm to persons or property, or in violent or turbulent behavior;
“(2) Making unreasonable noise or offensively coarse utterance, gesture, or display or communicating unwarranted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Terminiello v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Goodwin Ex Rel. Nall v. City of PainesvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- State v. HarveyOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. ReederOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. WoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. PhippsOhio Supreme Court · 1979
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.