Legal Opinion

State v. Reeder

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1985No. 84-1025PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The portion of Ohio’s disorderly conduct statute, R.C. 2917.11, at issue herein provides:

“(A) No person shall recklessly cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to another, by doing any of the following:
“(1) Engaging in fighting, in threatening harm to persons or property, or in violent or turbulent behavior. ” (Emphasis added.)1

In reversing the conviction, the court of appeals stated that it had previously held that “ ‘* * * the term “turbulent behavior” is not sufficiently definite to inform those of common intelligence of the point at which their conduct becomes impermissible and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. State v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Youngstown Club v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. In re R.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. CarrickOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. City of Garfield Heights v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Davis v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API