State v. Reeder
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.
The portion of Ohio’s disorderly conduct statute, R.C. 2917.11, at issue herein provides:
“(A) No person shall recklessly cause inconvenience, annoyance, or alarm to another, by doing any of the following:
“(1) Engaging in fighting, in threatening harm to persons or property, or in violent or turbulent behavior. ” (Emphasis added.)1
In reversing the conviction, the court of appeals stated that it had previously held that “ ‘* * * the term “turbulent behavior” is not sufficiently definite to inform those of common intelligence of the point at which their conduct becomes impermissible and a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- State v. HoffmanOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Youngstown Club v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re R.H.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. CarrickOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- City of Garfield Heights v. SimpsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Davis v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.