Legal Opinion

Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Under section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law no claim for medical or surgical treatment is enforcible, except (1) as incidental to, or a part of, an award to an injured employee; and (2) unless, within twenty days following the first treatment, the physician or surgeon furnishing the treatment shall furnish to the employer and the Industrial Board a report of the injury and treatment on a form prescribed by the Industrial Board. This applies to every claim by a physician or surgeon for services rendered to an injured employee, payment of which is sought through an award by the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Merrimac Anthracite Coal Corp. v. ShowalterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  2. Frant v. Robert Cobban & Son, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1929
  3. Claim of Weisberg v. Alexander Bros. Furniture Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Elting v. Will & Baumer Candle Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Claim of Cresbin v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API