Legal Opinion
Claim of Weisberg v. Alexander Bros. Furniture Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 17, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Kirk, P. J.
This is a motion in the alternative for reargument or for leave to go to the Court of Appeals. The appellants state the question presented as follows: “ Do the provisions of section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, as amended, permit an award by the State Industrial Board to the claimant for medical treatment, etc., furnished by the employer? ” The amendment referred to (Laws of 1927, chap. 553) is the insertion in section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the words, “ whether furnished by the employer or otherwise,” in the sentence which, as amended, reads: “ All fees and other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Sandberg v. Seymour Dress Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Claim of Koch v. Lehigh Valley RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Matter of Koch v. Lehigh Valley Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Matter of Finkelstein v. New York Merchandise CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Birschkus v. Krey Packing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Claim of Cresbin v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- Claim of Warak v. Certain-teed Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933