Legal Opinion

Benetic v. M/Y Athena Alexander

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 22, 2004No. 03-56441Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Nicholas and Sandra Benetic, on behalf of their family trust, appeal pro se the district court’s judgment and post-judgment orders in their maritime action seeking damages caused when M7Y Athena Alexander allied with S/V Buenos Aires on June 27, 1999. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo summary judgment, United States v. City of Tacoma, 332 F.3d 574, 578 (9th Cir.2003), questions of law in admiralty, Howard v. Crystal Cruises, Inc., 41 F.3d 527, 529 (9th Cir.1994), and selection of the legal standard for computation of damages, id. at 530. We review for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. City of Tacoma, WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. William McEuin v. Crown Equipment Corporation, Fka Crown Controls Corporation North West Handling Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. James J. Oppen, Arthur J. Luck and Glenn A. Henry v. Aetna Insurance Co., Union Oil Co. Of Calif.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. Lewis F. Stevens and Elvira B. Stevens v. F/v Bonnie Doon, Her Engines, MacHinery Tackle, Etc. Gene Koblick, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API