Legal Opinion

Management Investors v. United Mine Workers of America

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1978No. Civ. No. 3-78-17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBERT L. TAYLOR, District Judge.

This action is brought by the plaintiffs 1 under § 303 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (“the Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 187, for damages allegedly caused by the defendant’s illegal secondary boycott. Plaintiffs also seek to join claims arising solely under state law to their federal claim. For reasons which appear below, the Court *91declines to exercise its pendent jurisdiction in this case.

Questions of pendent jurisdiction raise two issues. First, does the Court have power to adjudicate the state claims? Second, if such power exists, is the case…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Kadlec v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Riverside Coal Company, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Kayser-Roth Corporation v. Textile Workers Union of America Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Runyan v. United Brotherhood of CarpentersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  2. Smith v. Metropolitan Development Housing AgencyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API