Smith v. Metropolitan Development Housing Agency
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, District Judge.
This case arose out of a dispute in state court regarding the ownership of a certain property located at 521 Southgate Avenue, in Nashville (hereinafter referred to as “the condemned property” or “the property”). The question of who owned the property was clearly answered several times by state courts in various actions between the plaintiff, Harold Smith, and his father, James Smith, and between James Smith and the defendant, the Metropolitan Development Housing Authority (hereinafter the “MDHA”), in this case. As the state court decisions were all adverse…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Borg-Warner Protective Services Corp. v. Guardsmark, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1996
- Epps Chevrolet Co. v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2015