Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 10, 1989No. 6566PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is the defendant’s appeal from the denial of his motion for modification of unallocated alimony and child support, which he filed on the ground of the plaintiff’s cohabitation with another person. The defendant claims the trial court erred in concluding (1) that the plaintiff was not living with another per*292son within the meaning of General Statutes § 46b-86 (b), and (2) that the plaintiffs living situation had not altered her financial circumstances. We find no error.

The following facts are dispositive of this appeal. The marriage of the parties was dissolved by the Superior Court on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Connolly v. ConnollySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Lupien v. LupienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  5. O'Bymachow v. O'BymachowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mihalyak v. MihalyakConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Clark v. Clark, No. Fa 77 0044102 (Nov. 9, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
  3. Horan v. Horan, No. 65729 (Jan. 28, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API