Legal Opinion

In re Steenbergh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 26, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, has charged respondent with conversion of client funds. Respondent admitted the facts set forth in the five specifications of the charge but denied the commission of professional misconduct in his answer. The court has granted petitioner’s motion for an order declaring that no factual issues were raised by the pleadings (22 NYCRR 806.5); respondent was thereafter heard in mitigation.

Respondent maintains an office for the practice of law in Athens, Greene County. He was admitted to the practice of law by this court in 1953.

In August 1978,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re HardyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. In re LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re CholakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. In re SteenberghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API