In re Steenbergh
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
By decision dated September 26, 1990, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of two years, effective October 26, 1990 (see, Matter of Steenbergh, 165 AD2d 953). He now applies for reinstatement.
Our examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]). Petitioner has advised that it has no grounds upon which to object to respondent’s application. Accordingly, respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.
Weiss, P. J., Levine,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re SteenberghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990