Legal Opinion

Metro. Casualty Ins. Co., of New York v. Walker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 4, 1942PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

In complying with the request of the Circuit Judge for instructions under Rule 38 of the Rules of Practice adopted by this Court the 17th of December, 1941, it is necessary for us to determine whether the counterclaim pleaded in the county court by virtue of Sections 1 and 2, Chapter 20426, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1941 (52.11 and 52.12 Florida Statutes, 1941) was compulsory or permissive as contemplated in that law.

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company instituted an action in the county court for Orange County against Richard H. Walker and United States Fidelity and Guaranty…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacksonville Paper Co. v. Smith & Winchester Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1941

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elliott v. RoachIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Neil v. South Florida Auto Painters, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Sastre v. Cabrera RaldirisSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  4. Evans v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. BournazianSupreme Court of Florida · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API