Legal Opinion

Cuesta Title Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided November 22, 1978No. Docket No. 7993-75Published

Petitioner was engaged in the business of examining land titles and offering title insurance service as an underwritten title company pursuant to California law. Petitioner established reserves for unearned premiums and reserves for unpaid losses, computed in accordance with reserve requirements applicable under California law to a title insurer.

Read the full summary

Petitioner was engaged in the business of examining land titles and offering title insurance service as an underwritten title company pursuant to California law. Petitioner established reserves for unearned premiums and reserves for unpaid losses, computed in accordance with reserve requirements applicable under California law to a title insurer. Held, since petitioner does not bear the economic risk of loss on the insurance contracts issued, it is not an insurance company taxable under sec. 831, I.R.C. 1954, and thus is not entitled to deductions for its reserves for losses.

1Opinion of the Court

Cuesta Title Guaranty Company, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Cuesta Title Guaranty Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 7993-75

United States Tax Court

71 T.C. 278; 1978 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 24;

November 22, 1978, Filed

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Petitioner was engaged in the business of examining land titles and offering title insurance service as an underwritten title company pursuant to California law. Petitioner established reserves for unearned premiums and reserves for unpaid losses, computed in accordance with reserve requirements applicable under…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Helvering v. Le GierseSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Bowers v. Lawyers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API