Legal Opinion

United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 19, 1928No. 46PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit brought by the respondent to recover the amount of taxes for the years 1918 through 1923, paid under duress, from which it says that it was exempt by the Acts under which the taxes were levied. It recovered in. the Court of Claims and a writ of certiorari was granted by this Court, April 9, 1928.

The respondent is incorporated under the laws of Ohio, by which it is recognized as a building and loan association, and it has conducted its business in accordance with the laws of that State. The Revenue Act of 1918', February 24, 1919, c. 18, § 231, 40 Stat. 1057, 1076, exempts from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Central Building, Loan & Savings Co. v. BowlandDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1914
  2. Herold v. Park View Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
  3. Parkview Building & Loan Ass'n v. HeroldDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1913

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hopkins Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ClearySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Bowers v. Lawyers Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Robert C. Sears and Lavonne Stern v. Karen AustinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  5. Bresler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API